03/25/2026
It’s now been 10 years since I made the first of these original aerial images, including “Mother Brain” (a reference not only to what I personally imagined when I first saw it, but to the all-time classic Super Metroid.)
I had explored photographing the formation with direct sunlight raking across the landscape, but I felt that the context added by the light destroyed the abstraction and the mystery. Additionally, since the the “tree” or “brain stem” was located within a concave depression, low-angle light only hit its surroundings, which drew attention away from the main idea of the composition and toward the edges of the frame. In the end, I felt soft light was the right choice for an already complex subject. This decision also gave me the freedom to work the color with intent, into a cohesive (and brain-like) red and pink palette.
Though the dendritic patterns were radial in nature, I felt they had a bit more of a horizontal flow with the brain oriented “right side up”, so I chose this framing to allow enough space for the important elements on all sides. I excluded distractions outside of what I saw as the brain shape, so that the titular idea could be conveyed effectively.
Nature photography should not be conflated with subject, nor location. There are so many more considerations that go into it than where to go and what to point at. I enjoy revisiting some of the same places and subjects year after year, because there is always something new to discover and create when I let go of prescribed ideas.
Even still, I have not felt particularly compelled to return to making images like these. This is despite frequenting this area for the last decade-plus, and despite the inherent novelty and abundance of aerial perspectives. I sold that drone many years ago, and finally bought another one last year. I’ve hardly used it, because I still prefer the slower, quieter process of standing behind the camera and tripod, observing the light and subject directly with my own two eyes.