Geoffrey Squier Silver Former Attorney & Counselor at Law

Geoffrey Squier Silver Former Attorney & Counselor at Law Photogaphy & Mediation Services He will advocate for you. He will empower you to make your best decisions. Mr.

Geoffrey Squier Silver’s 30 years of passionate practice show that human rights are more important than property rights, more important than money, and more important than greed. He will help you to heal the mistakes you’ve made in the past with honor and dignity, and he will help you avoid those mistakes in the future. He believes in your future as a free person, an honorable person, and will fig

ht to keep you from the callous grip of an uncaring legal system. When the entire force of the criminal justice system is against you, you deserve a dedicated attorney with the experience, passion, and dedication to stand up for you, to fight for you, and to fight for your freedom. Silver represents people accused of crimes from misdemeanors to felonies, including drug possession, manufacture, or distribution; drunk driving (DUII); white collar crime; robbery; assault; domestic violence; sex crime; and criminally negligent homicide. He works with people from all walks of life, and enjoys helping people who managed to get caught up in something they didn’t understand. As a retained attorney rather than a public defender, Mr. Silver can go the extra mile for you: he will provide individualized attention to you and to every detail, he will always take your calls and answer your questions, and he has the time, experience, and confidence to care about you and about your case. With 30 years of criminal justice experience in Multnomah, Clackamas, and Washington Counties — including the cities of Portland, Beaverton, Lake Oswego, Oregon City, Hillsboro, Gresham, Milwaukee and Beaverton — Geoffrey Squier Silver will fight for your rights and your freedom.

In 1975, two researchers at UC Santa Barbara decided to stop guessing and start recording.They sat in on 31 ordinary con...
06/30/2026

In 1975, two researchers at UC Santa Barbara decided to stop guessing and start recording.
They sat in on 31 ordinary conversations between men and women. They counted every single interruption.
Out of 48 interruptions — 47 came from men.
They published the findings. Nobody changed the meetings.
So forty years later, a linguist named Kieran Snyder started counting again. For weeks, she logged every interruption in every professional meeting she attended. Men interrupted three times more often than women. When men interrupted, they chose women as their target nearly three times as often as they chose other men.
She published it too.
Still, the meetings continued.
By 2017, researchers at Northwestern Law School had grown curious about a different room — one where surely the pattern wouldn't hold. They pulled twenty years of transcripts from United States Supreme Court oral arguments. They counted. Male justices interrupted female justices roughly three times as often as they interrupted each other.
Sonia Sotomayor. On the highest court in the country. Same invisible pattern as a first-year employee at a Monday morning sales meeting.
Here is what the numbers can't fully capture.
An interruption isn't just bad manners. It is a quiet edit — a signal sent to everyone in the room about whose words are still arriving and whose have already been dismissed. One interruption is a moment. A hundred interruptions across a career quietly builds a record: who got the airtime, who got credited, who got called "sharp" and who got called "a lot."
Performance reviews get written from those impressions.
Promotions get written from those reviews.
McKinsey and LeanIn.org have tracked workplace advancement for over a decade. Women fall behind men at the very first step — the jump from entry level to manager — at a rate that nothing later in a career fully repairs. When a man and woman contribute equally to the same project, observers consistently remember the man as the one who drove it. When that same project fails, they remember the woman.
The work was identical. The memory was not.
And almost none of it is deliberate.
Boys interrupt girls more often at age four. Teachers interrupt girls more than boys in classrooms. By the time anyone sits down at a conference table, the script has been quietly rehearsed across twenty years of small moments nobody thought to question. The pattern doesn't require intention. It only requires everyone to keep performing it without noticing.
We look at who leads, who presents, who gets named in the announcement — and we call it talent. We say he is just more confident. We say she is harder to read. And then we hand the outcome to the person we shaped across a thousand unexamined moments and call the whole thing a meritocracy.
What the research shows changes things is not a louder voice.
It is the room.
When women make up 60 to 80 percent of a group, the interruption pattern disappears. When organizations begin tracking meeting talk time as a real metric, behavior shifts within months. When a chair simply says "let her finish" — she finishes. The room remembers what she said. It gets written down. It gets credited.
The fix was never in her voice.
It was in whether the room had been trained to hear her.
She said it first. She has always said it first.
The only question was whether anyone was paying attention.

Lean In inspires women to lead. Explore free leadership programs, research-backed Circles, and data on women in the workplace. Join a global community.

In 1961, a 51-year-old drifter named Clarence Earl Gideon was living in Panama City, surviving on odd jobs and whatever ...
02/17/2026

In 1961, a 51-year-old drifter named Clarence Earl Gideon was living in Panama City, surviving on odd jobs and whatever work he could find. He had left school after eighth grade. He moved often. He had brushes with the law. He was not influential or well connected. If anything, he was invisible.

On June 3, 1961, a local pool hall was broken into. Someone forced open a cigarette machine and jukebox, taking beer, wine, and about sixty-five dollars. It was minor—but still a felony under Florida law. A witness placed Gideon at the scene earlier that day. That was enough. He was arrested and charged.

In August, Gideon stood alone in court. He had no lawyer and no money. He asked the judge to appoint one.

The judge refused.

Under Florida law at the time, attorneys were appointed only in capital cases—where the death penalty was possible. Gideon’s charge didn’t qualify.

He objected politely, saying he believed the Constitution guaranteed him counsel. The judge followed existing precedent. So Gideon defended himself.

He questioned witnesses. Tried to object. Spoke directly to jurors. But he didn’t know the rules of evidence or courtroom strategy. He was facing trained prosecutors with none of the training.

He was convicted and sentenced to five years.

For most people, that would have been the end.

But Gideon believed something fundamental was wrong.

From prison, he began studying law books. He learned that prisoners could petition the Supreme Court of the United States directly if constitutional rights had been violated.

On January 8, 1962, using pencil and prison stationery, he wrote a five-page petition. The handwriting was neat but unpolished. The argument was simple:

The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to counsel.

He was denied a lawyer because he was poor.

That violated the Constitution.

The Court receives thousands of petitions each year. Most are denied.

But the justices saw something bigger.

In 1942, in Betts v. Brady, the Court had ruled that states did not always have to provide attorneys to indigent defendants. Many justices had grown uneasy with that decision.

Gideon’s case offered a chance to revisit it.

The Court agreed to hear it. They appointed respected attorney Abe Fortas to argue on Gideon’s behalf.

The man who couldn’t afford a lawyer now had one of the nation’s best arguing before the highest court.

On January 15, 1963, Fortas argued that counsel is essential to a fair trial. Without a lawyer, a defendant—especially in a felony case—stands little chance.

The question wasn’t convenience.

It was justice.

On March 18, 1963, the Court delivered its decision in Gideon v. Wainwright.

Unanimous. 9–0.

Justice Hugo Black wrote that in America, a person too poor to hire a lawyer cannot receive a fair trial unless counsel is provided.

The Court overturned Betts v. Brady. States were now required to provide attorneys to defendants who could not afford them in criminal cases.

Gideon received a new trial.

This time, he had a court-appointed attorney, Fred Turner. Turner investigated thoroughly and challenged the prosecution’s case, which proved weaker than first presented.

On August 5, 1963, after less than an hour of deliberation, the jury acquitted him.

Same man.

Same charge.

Nearly the same evidence.

The difference was a lawyer.

The ruling reshaped American justice. States established public defender systems. Thousands of convictions were reconsidered. The principle became clear:

Justice cannot depend on wealth.

Gideon did not become wealthy or famous. He lived modestly and died in 1972 at age 61.

But his persistence altered constitutional law forever.

Today, when someone charged with a serious crime cannot afford an attorney, the court must appoint one.

That right feels obvious now.

It became obvious because a man in a prison cell, with no formal legal training and nothing but a pencil, insisted that the Constitution applied to him too.

He wasn’t perfect. He wasn’t powerful.

But he believed fairness should not be reserved for those who could pay.

And because he believed that, equal justice under law moved a little closer to reality for everyone.



Credit goes goes to the respective owner

12/09/2025

Fire On The Mountain. Pele awakes pumping lava in three fountains 1,200 feet high in eruption number 38.

A spectacular eruption at Hawaii's Kilauea volcano, one of the most active volcanoes in the world. This 12-hour event took place in the Halema‘uma‘u crater at Hawai‘i Volcanoes National Park on the Big Island. Eruption Event #38 included 3 lava fountains and destroyed the live camera volcanologists use to monitor it. My timing was impeccable, and I was able to photograph the eruptions at Kilauea, that began Saturday morning and sent lava shooting at least 1,000 feet into the air, according to the USGS. Several of the eruptions that occurred since the series began in December 2024 have produced high fountains -- some up to 1,500 feet, according to the USGS.

Video in comments.

02/16/2025
02/11/2025

A claimed author Tom Robbins has left this earthly plane. He left behind many pearls of wisdom.
“I’m descended from a long line of preachers and policemen,” he told a magazine in 2000. “Now, it’s common knowledge that cops are congenital liars, and evangelists spend their lives telling fantastic tales in such a way as to convince otherwise rational people that they’re factual. So, I guess I come by my narrative inclinations naturally.”

01/29/2025

WHAT TO DO AT AN ICE CHECKPOINT, ESPECIALLY IF YOU ARE WHITE and/or FEEL THE NEED TO JAM UP THE WORKS.

Here's the deal:
🔘 Border Patrol can verify citizenship within 100 miles of a border or "external boundary." This includes coastlines, so NYC, Philadelphia, and all of NJ are within the 100-mile zone.
🔘 Border patrol can only ask brief questions about citizenship, and they cannot hold you for an extended time without cause.
🔘 You always have the right to remain silent. You do not need to answer their questions.
🔘 WITH THAT SAID, IF YOU ARE A BORN CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES AND ESPECIALLY IF YOU ARE WHITE, YOU NEED TO SPEAK THE F**K UP.
🔘 The most important acts of resistance are the small ones. Make it difficult and uncomfortable for ICE agents to do their jobs. They are counting on citizens to turn a blind eye and allow them to deport undocumented citizens without challenge. Disabuse of that notion.
🔘 If you are on a train, bus, or anything else and ICE or CBP boards, you need to stand up and loudly let everyone know that they have the right to remain silent or only answer questions in the presence of an attorney, no matter their citizenship or immigration status. There have been numerous reports that confronting the agents in this way has caused them to leave without verifying citizenship. THIS CAN SAVE LIVES. 🙌
🔘 If you see anyone being held up by immigration, loudly ask if they are being detained and if they are free to go.
🔘 Immigration officers cannot detain anyone without reasonable suspicion, an agent must have specific facts about you that make it reasonable to believe you are committing or committed, a violation of immigration law or federal law. If an agent detains you, you can ask for their basis for reasonable suspicion, and they should tell you.
🔘 Always say no to a search and let everyone know that they can and should refuse consent to a search.
🔘 They cannot search or arrest anyone without facts about that make it probable that they are committing, or committed, a violation of immigration law or federal law.
🔘 Silence alone meets neither of these standards. Nor does race or ethnicity alone suffice for either probable cause or reasonable suspicion
🔘 white citizens, you have a level of privilege which protects us from retaliation from ICE for being "rude" and making a scene, which makes it our DUTY to speak up and make sure people without the same privilege know their rights. GET LOUD. YELL. YELL IN SPANISH IF YOU KNOW IT. LET PEOPLE KNOW THEY DON'T HAVE TO SAY S**T. MAKE ICE UNCOMFORTABLE. THROW SAND IN THE GEARS OF WHITE SUPREMACY.
⭐️ Bonus info- ⭐️
🔘It is perfectly legal to record immigration agents as long as you are not on government property or at a port of entry. If your train/bus gets boarded, pull your phone out and start videotaping immediately.
🔘 If you are detained or see someone getting detained, get the agent's name, number, and any other identifying information. Get it on video if possible.
🔘 Contact the ACLU or your local Immigrant/Migrant support orgs if you see someone's rights being violated.

(this has been copy and pasted -- please do the same)

The struggle over whether the U.S. government should work for everyone or for the very wealthy and corporations was on d...
10/25/2024

The struggle over whether the U.S. government should work for everyone or for the very wealthy and corporations was on display today. Cable and internet providers and home security companies sued to stop the newly finalized Federal Trade Commission “click-to-cancel” rule that says it must be as easy to cancel a service as it is to sign up for it.

Also today, the Department of Transportation reached a record settlement of $50 million with American Airlines, whose damage to wheelchairs and dangerous physical assistance to disabled passengers has broken laws. Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), who lost both legs in combat in the Iraq War, praised the fine and commented: “When an airline damages or breaks someone’s wheelchair, it’s like breaking their legs.”

"The era of tolerating poor treatment of airline passengers with disabilities is over," U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said in a statement. "With this penalty, we are setting a new standard of accountability for airlines that violate the civil rights of passengers with disabilities. By setting penalties at levels beyond the mere cost of doing business for airlines, we're aiming to change how the industry behaves and prevent these kinds of abuses from happening in the first place.”

A reader called to my attention that the recent Federal Election Commission filings showed one significant difference in the expenditures of the two presidential campaigns. The Harris campaign spent $34,550.02 on sign language interpreting services. The Trump campaign spent $0.00.

These details of governance are fragments of a larger picture of how we see our country. Are we all created equal and entitled to be treated equally before the law? Or are some people better than others?

CNN was supposed to host another presidential debate tonight, but while Vice President Kamala Harris accepted, Trump declined to attend. In place of a debate, CNN invited each candidate to hold a town hall. Harris accepted; Trump declined.

In her discussion with host Anderson Cooper, Harris focused on the reiteration yesterday by Trump’s longest-serving White House chief of staff, retired U.S. Marine Corps general John Kelly, that Trump had spoken admiringly of Adolf Hi**er and expressed a desire to have generals like Hi**er’s. In an interview with the New York Times, Kelly said Trump “met the definition of a fascist, would govern like a dictator if allowed, and had no understanding of the Constitution or the concept of rule of law.”

The ideology of fascism is associated with Italian journalist and politician Benito Mussolini, who articulated a new political ideology in the 1920s. Mussolini had been a socialist as a young man and had grown frustrated at how hard it was to organize people. No matter what socialists tried, they seemed unable to convince their neighbors that they must rise up and take over the country’s means of production. The efficiency of World War I inspired Mussolini to give up on socialism and develop a new political theory.

Mussolini rejected the equality that defined democracy and came to believe that some men were better than others. Those few must lead, taking a nation forward by directing the actions of the rest. They must organize the people as they had during wartime, ruthlessly suppressing all opposition and directing the economy so that business and politicians worked together. Logically, that select group of leaders would elevate a single man, who would become an all-powerful dictator. To weld their followers into an efficient machine, they demonized opponents into an “other” that their followers could hate.

This hierarchical system of government was called “fascism” after the bundle of rods tied around an axe that was the ancient Roman symbol of authority and power. Italy adopted it, and Mussolini’s ideas inspired others, notably Germany’s Adolf Hi**er. These leaders believed that their new system would reclaim a glorious past with the ideology of the future, welding pure men into a military and social machine that moved all as one, while pure women supported society as mothers. They set out to eliminate those who didn’t fit their model and to destroy the messy, inefficient democracy that stood in their way.

But while today we associate fascism with this European movement, its foundational principle—that some men are better than others and have the right and even the duty to rule over the majority—runs parallel to that same strand in United States history. Indeed, N**i lawyers and judges turned to America’s Jim Crow laws for inspiration, and Hi**er looked to America’s Indigenous reservations as a way to rid a country of “unwanted” people.

For retired Marine general John Kelly to have spoken out against Trump before the 2024 election was a huge deal. As Secretary Buttigieg put it: “It’s one thing for some leftist group to call you a fascist. Quite another when it’s a fellow Republican. And absolutely astonishing when it’s your own chief of staff.” But Kelly was not alone. Former chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley told veteran journalist Bob Woodward that Trump is “fascist to the core.”

In tonight’s CNN town hall, Vice President Harris told Cooper that she agreed that Trump is a fascist. She noted that when a four-star Marine general comes out two weeks before an election to warn Americans that one of the candidates is a fascist, we should see this as “a 911 call to the American people.”

Trump is “increasingly unstable,” Harris said, “and unfit to serve…. [T]he people who know Donald Trump best, the people who worked with him in the White House, in the Situation Room, in the Oval Office, all Republicans by the way, who served in his administration, his former chief of staff, his national security advisor, former secretaries of defense, and his vice president have all called him unfit and dangerous. They have said explicitly he has contempt for the Constitution of the United States. They have said he should never again serve as President of the United States,” she said.

When Trump talks about “the enemy within,” Harris said, “ [h]e's talking about the American people. He's talking about journalists, judges, nonpartisan election officials…. And he's going to sit there unstable, unhinged, plotting his revenge, plotting his retribution. Creating an enemies list.” In contrast, she said, she would have a “to-do list” to work on the things that matter to the American people.

When Trump responded to Kelly’s claims, he appeared to confuse Kelly, who was retired when Trump chose him to serve as White House chief of staff, and Mark Milley, the active-duty chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Trump referred to four-star general Kelly, whose son died in Afghanistan, as “tough and dumb,” a “LOWLIFE, and a bad General,” but then went on to talk of him as active duty and to say he stopped seeking his advice in the White House.

Forced to comment on Kelly’s comment about Trump’s embracing fascism, Republican leaders are either ducking the question or acting as if it is not a big deal. On CNN this morning, New Hampshire governor Chris Sununu said the news that Trump has praised Hi**er will not affect Sununu’s support. “If we can get a Republican mindset out of Washington,” he said, “we need that culture change.”

At a rally tonight in Macon, Georgia, Trump agreed with the audience as it chanted: “Lock him up.” “You should lock them up,” Trump said. “Lock up the Bidens. Lock up Hillary. Lock ‘em up.”

Tonight, Shawn Reilly, the mayor of Waukesha, Wisconsin—a key Republican stronghold—announced he’s voting for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz.



Notes:

https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/telecom-group-sues-block-ftcs-click-cancel-rule-2024-10-23/

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/american-airlines-50-million-fine-settlement-passengers-with-disabilities/

https://www.fec.gov/data/candidates/president/presidential-map/

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/22/us/politics/john-kelly-trump-fitness-character.html

Robert J. Miller, “N**i Germany's Race Laws, the United States, and American Indians,” St. Johns Law Review 94, No. 3 (2020): 756.

https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2024-10-23/the-high-profile-military-leaders-who-have-come-out-against-donald-trump

https://www.fox6now.com/news/waukesha-mayor-endorses-kamala-harris

X:

SenDuckworth/status/1849230999265096073

KamalaHQ/status/1849277991219507297

BlackKnight10k/status/1849269481832374750

atrupar/status/1849123165194117432

ruthbenghiat/status/1849152446582407619

atrupar/status/1849256415484850432

atrupar/status/1849256882935931110

atrupar/status/1849273223638065658

kaitlancollins/status/1849217912877277470

PeteButtigieg/status/1849246285326332319

~ Heather Cox Richardson

My old neighborhood.  Part of the Lewis & Clark exposition.
10/20/2024

My old neighborhood. Part of the Lewis & Clark exposition.

“World’s Largest Log Cabin”. Portland, Oregon, 1938. Built In 1905, Burned Down In 1964.

09/27/2024

Address

White Salmon, WA

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Geoffrey Squier Silver Former Attorney & Counselor at Law posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share