03/03/2026
Check out my latest photo essay, Extractive Photography: When Images Steal and Plunder, at the link in bio.
We all know exploitative photography — when a photographer uses subjects in vulnerable conditions for their own credentials like photographing unhoused people without their consent or capturing moments that don’t accurately reflect the reality or anything by Bruce Gilden. (If you want to see an incredibly vile form of this photography, don’t look up Chris Arnade, a Wall Street trader who bribed s*x workers with drugs to take their photos).
But extractive photography takes it a step further. It steals more than just the aesthetics of the subject. It uses photography to tell a specific narrative to then physically extract something from a place (the land, labor, or resources) once the photos have served their purpose. The industry of journalism and photography uses imagery for extractive means, whether or not it was the photographer’s intention. Most of the time, these photographers aren’t acting as individuals, they are a part of a larger institution that amplifies their photography. Editors choose the narrative fueled by a publication’s drive for profits and inflamed by a culture that rewards clickbait. It’s the underlying nature of living within a capitalist system.
Wartime photography in particular is an especially insidious form of extractive photography. At some level, it’s important that political crises are documented. These images piece together various perspectives of political upheaval and can expose realities unfamiliar to many people. On another level, these photographs have almost always been used to tell an imperialist narrative and distort the truth, or at a minimum erase the context. Washington uses the New York Times, WaPo, and Fox News to beat the drums of war.
Read more at the link in bio