07/01/2024
Hot topic 🔥 What’s the difference between a documentary-style photographer and editorial-style photographer?
I used to think I was purely documentary-style, but once I truly saw the difference, I realized I was more of a blend of the two.
See a true documentary-style wedding photographer doesn’t ask for anything to be curated, that includes backgrounds! This was my first indicator. The main backdrop that is typically curated is the getting ready space. A documentary photographer will not ask for anything to be organized - they capture the mess, the clutter, everything how it is. While that sounds great in theory, I’m a little too OCD to take this approach myself. I love a clean and uncluttered background in order to move the focus to the main subject. While I leave a lot of key storytelling details, I don’t always leave it exactly as is. Curating an environment is actually considered to be more of an editorial approach.
Another key sign of a documentary style photographer is that they don’t pose their couples. They are literally a fly on a wall, capturing 100% authentic interactions.
While certain parts of the day are documented with this approach, I love guiding my couples in subtle ways, assisting them with prompts that feel fitting for their personalities, and having a slightly more hands-on approach. This is also more along the lines of editorial-style.
I think a lot of photographers have a mixed approach when it comes to a wedding day. We don’t want it to feel like an all-out photoshoot the whole day but we also want to help out with our professional experience. You’re hiring someone for their eye but also for how you interact with them, how they create a comfortable atmosphere, how they help bring out your connection with your partner and set aside any distractions.
So, for my photographers out there, which one are you? A wallflower documentary-style photographer or a curated editorial photographer (or a mix)? What are your thoughts on these approaches? Would love to know in the comments!