05/26/2026
A fun little comparison of the Trifid Nebula from my backyard in May 2025 with a widefield capture of the same region of space vs. the Vera C. Rubin Observatory's image a month later with the Simonyi Survey Telescope with the world largest camera sensor at 3.2 gigapixel CCD camera and the Hubble image from April 2026.
While the Hubble Space Telescope uses the Widefield Camera 3 (WFC3) made of two optical/ultraviolet CCDs with a near-infrared HgCdTe array. It is a monochrome setup that uses filters to connect light from Oxyge-III, Hydrogen-alpha and Sulfur-II
F502N (OII) @ 5nm, F656N (H-alpha) @ 10nm, F673N (SIII) @ 12nm to get these images.
It's interesting to note the differences and similarities with scientific instruments and modern day consumer grade equipment. My image was about 2 hours of data from my LA light polluted backyard at Bortle 9 with a second hand budget 2.5" Quadruplet Astrograph with a cooled color astronomy camera with 26 megapixel.
Rubin's image is a stack of 678 images with 7 hours of integration. My image is a stack of 22 images of 5 minutes with a total time of 1hr 55min. There was no info available on imaging time for the Hubble image but it was processed with the same astronomy software I use.
More at
https://www.instagram.com/astro626photos
Gear
Astro-Tech AT65EDQ Quadruplet Astrograph
OGMA AP26CC OSC Camera (Sony IMX571)
IDAS NBZ-II Dual Narrowband Filter
Proxisky UMi 17R with FRAM
Svbony SV165 40mm Guide Scope
ZWO ASI120MM MINI Guide Camera
EXIF
22x300 lights with calibration frames
Captured with NINA
Processed in PixInsight