08/23/2026
Some of you may not be aware, but the FCC is currently considering a retroactive restriction on the continued importation and marketing of previously approved foreign-made drones based, in part, on a proposed definition of “military-grade” that includes common technologies such as thermal cameras, LiDAR sensors, certain payload capabilities, and other advanced systems.
Why does this matter?
Foreign manufacturers, such as DJI and Autel Robotics currently account for roughly 90% of the U.S. consumer drone market and more than 70% of the enterprise market. These drones aren't just recreational equipment, they are tools used every day by small businesses, first responders, farmers, surveyors, contractors, utility companies, and search-and-rescue organizations across the country.
For a small business like ours, this issue hits close to home. We've invested thousands of dollars into equipment and technology that allows us to provide commercial services while also assisting our community with search and recovery efforts for missing people, pets, livestock, and wildlife.
Thermal cameras allow us to locate heat signatures that may be impossible to see with the human eye. LiDAR and advanced sensing technologies help our aircraft detect obstacles and operate more safely. These technologies have legitimate civilian and public-safety applications every single day.
We absolutely support protecting national security and strengthening American drone manufacturing. But we also believe there is a major difference between addressing a legitimate security vulnerability and simply labeling useful civilian technology as “military-grade” because it is installed on a drone.
This issue could have a significant impact on small businesses, public-safety agencies, taxpayers, and the future of the American drone industry.
We encourage drone operators, public-safety professionals, business owners, and anyone else who may be affected to educate themselves on FCC DA 26-758 / PS Docket No. 26-189 and make their voices heard.
We've also attached a link to the letter we've submitted to the FCC in opposition of the retroactive ban if you would like to read it.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fsuOPAbwFJoswuXoFt77geZ9pgzKKI98/view?usp=sharing
