09/02/2026
THIS!! Everything that Lindsay said on her post!! It makes me so angry, but this is why I stopped sharing kids faces publicly and started thinking differently about how I post as a photographer in the time of unregulated/unresticted ai.
There are some things I never expected to have to think about as a photographer. The possibility that a photograph of a child could be taken from a gallery, fed into a machine, manipulated into something sexually explicit, and used to exploit that child is one of them.
And yet here we are.
I've been sitting with the recent news surrounding AI-generated child sexual abuse material, and if I'm being honest, I don't really know how to talk about it without sounding angry. Because I am angry. I'm angry that this is something we have to discuss at all, and I'm angry that technology has advanced so quickly that we can create disturbingly realistic sexual imagery of people who never consented to it, especially children.
As a photographer, this hits differently. People hand me photographs of their children, their families, their bodies, their lives. They trust me with moments that cannot be recreated. That responsibility doesn't end when I take the photograph. It extends to what happens to those images afterward.
I'm paying much closer attention to the technology and companies I allow into my workflow. I'm asking harder questions about how images are stored, processed, retained, and used. If I can't get a straight answer about what happens to your photographs, I'm not comfortable handing them over. I don't think that's being paranoid. I think it's the bare minimum.
And yes, I'm going to say the political part OUT LOUD. I know some people believe businesses should stay out of politics, but my business is built around people, their bodies, their families, their autonomy, and their trust. So when I see our government failing to keep pace with technology that can be used to exploit children, I'm not interested in pretending I don't have an opinion.
We hear so much about being “pro-child” and protecting children. I want us to actually mean it. Protecting children doesn't stop at conception. It means protecting them from abuse, exploitation, hunger, illness, and the very real dangers we've created in the digital world. And if that doesn't express why I am pro-choice, I don't know what will.
I can't control what lawmakers do. I can't control what someone on the internet chooses to do. But I can control what I do with the photographs you trust me with. I can choose the technology I use. I can question the companies I work with. I can be intentional about photographs of children. And I can refuse to treat your images like disposable content.
Because they're not.
They're your lives, your babies, your bodies, your memories. And you trusted me with them. I take that seriously.