14/07/2026
Its been a while, how is everyone doing? Sorry for being radio silent for so long. Been working on so much stuff, here is a hot topic for you, the use of AI in photography. Click on the link at the bottom of the page to take you to the blog and see it you can figure out whether the images on the blog are real or AI generated.
If a photographer secretly uses AI to create one image, can you trust the rest of their portfolio?
AI is rapidly changing photography, and I don't believe that's necessarily a bad thing.
I use AI-assisted technology myself, particularly for removing noise from wildlife photographs taken at higher ISO settings. For me, that's simply another tool in the editing process — the animal was real, the location was real, and I was there to press the shutter.
But what happens when someone uses AI to generate a completely fictional image and presents it as a genuine photograph without acknowledging how it was created?
That's where I believe we have a problem.
There is nothing wrong with AI-generated art. But if an image was never captured by a camera, should it really be presented as photography?
And perhaps more importantly, if a photographer is discovered passing off one AI-generated image as genuine, does that call the authenticity of their entire portfolio into question?
I've written a new blog post sharing my thoughts on AI, photography, ethics and why I believe transparency matters more than ever.
I'd genuinely love to hear what you think. Where do you draw the line?
AI in Photography: A Useful Tool, But Where Do We Draw the Line? Artificial intelligence is changing photography. Whether we like it or not, AI is now part of the photographic world, appearing in cameras, editing software and noise-reduction tools. Used responsibly, I believe AI has a genuine and v