varun official

varun official Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from varun official, Bharatpur.

🇺🇸 HISTORY USA | HIDDEN STORIES
📜 Discover America’s forgotten history
🕰️ Untold stories • Rare facts • Historic moments
🔎 Exploring the past, one story at a time
🇺🇸 Follow for daily history content!

05/09/2026

France announced on September 4, 2026, that its Foreign Ministry will move away from the Mercator projection in diplomatic uses, favoring maps that more accurately represent the relative size of countries and continents.

The Mercator projection was created by Flemish cartographer Gerardus Mercator in 1569. It was extremely useful for navigation because it allowed sailors to plot constant compass bearings as straight lines, but it came with a major tradeoff: landmasses become increasingly enlarged the farther they are from the equator.

As a result, Europe, Russia, Canada and Greenland appear disproportionately large compared with Africa and South America. Greenland, for example, can look nearly as large as Africa on a Mercator map, even though Africa is actually about 14 times larger.

The change comes amid the African Union-backed “Correct the Map” campaign, which promotes equal-area projections such as Equal Earth. On the same day as France’s announcement, the UN General Assembly voted 164–1, with 6 abstentions, for a non-binding resolution encouraging more accurate representations of continental size.

Map source: FRENCH FOREIGN MINISTRY

The Mystery Behind This 19th-Century Photograph 📜At first glance, this looks like an ordinary portrait of a couple from ...
05/09/2026

The Mystery Behind This 19th-Century Photograph 📜

At first glance, this looks like an ordinary portrait of a couple from the 1800s—but photographs like this can tell us a surprising amount about everyday life in the 19th century.

The image has the distinctive appearance of an early studio portrait: a carefully arranged pose, formal clothing, a plain backdrop, and serious expressions. During the early days of photography, taking a portrait was very different from taking a picture with a smartphone today. Exposure times could be long, so people often had to remain extremely still. That is one reason why many old photographs show people with calm, serious faces.

The woman is dressed in a long dark cloak with decorative buttons and a large bow around her neck. Her hairstyle and headwear reflect the fashion of the period. Beside her sits a man wearing a formal light-colored coat, trousers, tall boots, and a hat. His carefully groomed mustache and beard add to the unmistakable 19th-century appearance.

What makes photographs like this fascinating is that we can see details that written history sometimes leaves behind. Clothing, hairstyles, furniture, photography studios, and even the way people posed can provide clues about social customs and technology of the time.

It is also important to remember that the exact identity of the people in this particular image should not be assumed without a reliable historical source. Old photographs are frequently reposted online with incorrect names, dates, or stories attached to them. A photograph can be fascinating even when its complete history remains unknown.

The sepia tone gives the image an aged appearance, but the original photograph may have been a black-and-white print that changed color over time or was later reproduced with a sepia effect.

Imagine sitting in a photography studio more than a century ago, wearing your finest clothes and preparing for a portrait that might become one of the few surviving records of your life. There were no smartphones, instant previews, or social-media posts. A single photograph could be something a family treasured for generations.

That is what makes historical photography so powerful. A simple portrait can become a tiny window into another era.

Look closely at the clothing, expressions, pose, and background. Every detail tells a small part of the story.

History isn't always found in famous battles or presidents. Sometimes, it's hidden in an old photograph. 🕰️📸

When you think of the Civil War, quilting probably doesn’t come immediately to mind. But the role of quilting in the war...
04/09/2026

When you think of the Civil War, quilting probably doesn’t come immediately to mind. But the role of quilting in the war effort is quite interesting.

It became evident early in the war that the South would need ironclad gunboats to try to break the Northern blockade. In order to try to help raise the money to build the boats, Southern women made quilts, which were then raffled or auctioned off to raise the money. Three “petticoat gunboats” were built with the proceeds of these “gunboat quilts.”

Northern ladies were quilting too. Northern “Ladies Aid Societies” made approximately 250,000 quilts that they then donated for use by Northern soldiers during the war. Due to a shortage of coffins, many of these quilts ended up being used as burial shrouds for soldiers who died in hospitals.

The image on the left is a “gunboat quilt” made by Martha Jane Dickson Hatter of Greensboro, Alabama in 1862, now located at the Birmingham Museum of Art. The one on the right is a quilt made by Cornelia Dow and others in Portland, Maine in 1864. The quilt bears the inscription “While our fingers guide the needle, our thoughts are intense (in tents).”

Late in the afternoon of August 19, 1745, at Glenfinnan, in the western Scottish Highlands, William Murray, Marquess of ...
04/09/2026

Late in the afternoon of August 19, 1745, at Glenfinnan, in the western Scottish Highlands, William Murray, Marquess of Tullibardine stood before about 900 cheering Highlanders and drove a pole into the ground, atop of which flew a flag with a with square on a red background. Once the flag was hoisted, Charles Edward Stuart stepped forward and read a proclamation, declaring his father James to be King of England and Scotland. The Jacobite Rebellion of 1745 (or just “the ‘45” as it would be popularly remembered) was on.

James was the exiled son of King James II of England and VII of Scotland, who had been deposed by the Glorious Revolution, which put Protestant William of Orange on the throne. Jacobites (so called because of their loyalty to James, Jacobus in Latin) insisted that the Stuarts remained the rightful, God-ordained heirs to the crown. After a failed Jacobite uprising in 1715, James had retreated to Rome, where he lived under papal protection surrounded by a “court in exile.” There his son Charles was born in December 1720. Twenty-four and a half years later, with French assistance, Charles and a handful of followers landed on the rugged coast of the Scottish Highlands, intent on reclaiming the throne for his father.

The ceremony on August 19 was called “raising the royal standard,” evoking an ancient practice—the raising of the king’s personal banner in times of public emergency as a call summoning all able-bodied males to come with their arms and rally to the flag. Because Charles didn’t actually have a bona fide royal standard on him, some of the ladies of Clan MacDonald on Loch Shiel had hastily created one for him. It was under that flag that “Bonnie Prince Charlie” read his father’s proclamation (translated from English into Scots Gaelic as he read, for the benefit of his audience). By the end of the day some 1,200 Highlanders had answered the call and with them Charles marched on Edinburgh.

Charles and his army swept across Scotland, gathering strength, then crossed into England, eventually coming to within 130 miles of London. But the people of England did not rise in favor of the Jacobites, as Charles had hoped, and the French assistance he had counted on never materialized. With the forces of George II growing ever stronger and preparing to attack, Charles and his army (over his objections) retreated back into Scotland. There they were soundly defeated at the Battle of Culloden, permanently ending the Jacobite threat.

Charles escaped to the continent and lived out the rest of life dissolutely, dying in Rome in 1788 at age 67.

Charles Stuart raised the royal standard at Glenfinnan, commencing the Jacobite Rebellion of 1745, two hundred eighty-one years ago today.

The Roman army led by Julius Caesar had been campaigning in Gaul (much of modern-day France and Belgium and parts of Swi...
04/09/2026

The Roman army led by Julius Caesar had been campaigning in Gaul (much of modern-day France and Belgium and parts of Switzerland) for several years, subduing the tribes living in the territory and bringing them under Roman authority, when in 52 BC the tribes united under a charismatic Arveni chieftain named Vercingetorix, determined to defeat the Romans and maintain Gallic sovereignty and independence.

Vercingetorix’s principal strategy was to draw Ceasar’s army deep into Gallic territory, then cut off its supplies, forcing it to retreat or face starvation. After several inconclusive battles, Vercingetorix withdrew his army into a strongly fortified position on a hill at Alesia (believed to have been in eastern France near modern-day Dijon, although there is still some ongoing debate about the location). Ceasar, with his army of about 50,000 men, enveloped the hilltop fortification (called an oppidum) and began constructing siege fortifications, intending to starve Vercingetorix into submission. Meanwhile Vercingetorix sent out messages summoning all the Gallic tribes to come and attack the Romans.

Vercingetorix’s plan was sound. When the Gallic relief armies arrived, he intended to sally out of the fort and attack the Romans, while the relief forces attacked them from behind the siege lines. Trapped between the two attacking forces (which would greatly outnumber the Romans) Ceasar’s army would be destroyed.

But Caesar anticipated the strategy and constructed a brilliant system of trenches, walls, towers, and obstacles unlike anything the Gauls had seen before—works that faced both inward and outward, protecting against both attacks from inside the fort and from behind his siege lines. It was an engineering accomplishment that would be studied and imitated for centuries.

Trapped inside the tight grip of the Roman siege lines, the Gauls inside Alesia (probably numbering about 80,000 men) soon began to run out of food. To conserve resources for the fighting men, Vercingetorix expelled everyone else in the fort—the sick, the elderly, the women, and the children, perhaps assuming the Romans would allow them into their lines and would feed them. But the Romans refused, leaving them to starve between the two lines. “When they came up to our fortifications, they wept and begged the soldiers to take them as slaves and give them something to eat,” Caesar wrote in his Commentaries on the War in Gaul, “But I had guards posted all along the rampart with orders not to allow any of them inside our lines.”

When the Gallic relief armies finally arrived (estimates of the size of the relief armies range from 50,000 to over 200,00) the joint attacks that Vercingetorix had counted on began. But the Romans fought with their characteristic discipline, skill and courage. Their defenses proved impenetrable, and the Gauls were driven back with heavy losses. Eventually the relief army recognized the impossibility of breaking the Roman lines and they withdrew. With any hope of breaking the siege now lost, Vercingetorix recognized that his situation was hopeless, and he surrendered personally to Caesar.

Considered Ceasar’s greatest victory, the Battle of Alesia secured Roman dominance over Gaul for the next 500 years. Fearful of the prestige Ceasar earned from the victory and his soaring popularity with the public, the Senate denied him the triumphal procession in Rome that would ordinarily have been granted, contributing to the tension that would culminate in Ceasar’s crossing of the Rubicon three years later and the outbreak of the civil war that would bring him to power. Once Ceasar had won that war he gave himself his long overdue triumph, parading the spoils of the Gallic war, including a caged Vercingetorix, through the streets of Rome. Afterwards, as was the custom, Vercingetorix was ritually strangled.

The painting is “Vercingetorix Throws Down his Arms at the Feet of Julius Caesar,” by Lionel Royer (1899).

04/09/2026

🇺🇸 IN 1900, AMERICA FACED A NIGHTMARE…

Imagine waking up one morning and realizing a powerful storm was heading straight toward your city. 🌪️

On September 8, 1900, a devastating hurricane struck Galveston, Texas.

There were no smartphones.
No modern weather apps.
No instant emergency alerts.

Galveston was a busy and growing American city—but the storm changed everything.

The disaster became one of the deadliest natural disasters in U.S. history and forever changed how America approached hurricane protection and emergency preparedness.

📜 More than 100 years later, the story of Galveston still reminds us how powerful nature can be.

👇 If you could travel back to 1900 for one day, would you?

Follow HISTORY USA | HIDDEN STORIES 🇺🇸 for more forgotten American history.

04/09/2026

🇺🇸 America in 1900 — A Glimpse Into the Past

In 1900, the United States was entering a new century and changing rapidly. Cities were growing, factories were expanding, and millions of people were moving in search of work and a better life.

🚂 Railroads connected distant parts of the country, while horse-drawn carriages still filled many city streets. Electricity was beginning to transform homes and businesses, but it was far from universal.

🏙️ New York City was already a major center of commerce and immigration. In 1900, the city was home to millions of people, and its streets were crowded with workers, horse carts, shops, and newly developing transportation systems.

📜 Life in 1900 was very different from today—no smartphones, no internet, and no modern cars dominating the streets.

1900 was the beginning of a century that would completely transform America. 🇺🇸

Follow HISTORY USA | HIDDEN STORIES for more forgotten American history.

Macbeth, king of Scots, died in Aberdeenshire on this day in 1057, having been mortally wounded at the Battle of Lumphan...
04/09/2026

Macbeth, king of Scots, died in Aberdeenshire on this day in 1057, having been mortally wounded at the Battle of Lumphanan by the army of his rival Malcolm, who would later reign as King Malcolm III.

Macbeth had acquired the throne of Scotland (then called the kingdom of Alba) in 1040, following the death of his cousin King Duncan I, but not by treacherously murdering him in bed, as in the Shakespeare play. Rather, Duncan was killed in battle after leading an army into the semiautonomous province of Moray in the north of what is now Scotland (a province that was ruled by Macbeth), and Macbeth succeeded him to the throne.

Macbeth reigned 17 years, mostly without serious opposition, until he was killed by forces loyal to Malcolm, Duncan’s son. He was buried on Iona, the traditional burial site for Scottish kings. Macbeth’s stepson Lulach ruled briefly after his father’s death, until he was assassinated on Malcolm’s orders. After Lulach’s death, Malcolm took the throne and he and his descendants would rule Scotland for the next 200 years.

Although the scant historical record shows that Macbeth was an efficient and good king, whose reign was mostly peaceful despite the turbulent times, thanks to Shakespeare he is remembered today as a tyrant and murderous villain, eventually killed in a duel by a man whose family had been murdered on Macbeth’s orders. But the inaccurate history isn’t entirely just the kind of liberties too often taken by writers of historical fiction. Rather, Macbeth’s historical reputation had already been ruined by the time Shakespeare wrote his play. Shakespeare followed the portrayal of Macbeth found in Raphael Holinshed’s 16th century collection of Chronicles, which itself is derived from the account of 14th century Scottish priest John of Fordun. He spiced it all up, of course, but Shakespeare did not single-handedly invent the evil Macbeth.

The portrait by Jacob de Wet II is from the 17th century.

04/09/2026

In 1752 Great Britain transitioned from the Julian Calendar to the Gregorian calendar. Because there was an eleven-day difference in the two calendars, it was necessary for the British to skip eleven days in order to “catch up.” So, by act of Parliament, in Great Britain and the British colonies, in 1752 the day after September 2 was September 14, not September 3. The change is said to have caused widescale rioting across England, as people demanded the return of the eleven “stolen” days. How did this all come about?

For 600 years, in England the first day of the new year was not January 1, but rather March 25, which was popularly known as “Lady Day.” Officially the “Feast of the Annunciation,” Lady Day celebrated the angel Gabriel’s announcement to the Virgin Mary that she was to give birth to the Messiah. Even as the rest of the Western World celebrated New Year’s Day on the first day of January, England stubbornly held on the practice of beginning the new year on Lady Day, in part because it coincided neatly with the beginning of an agricultural year.

But in 1750 England finally succumbed to the pressure to conform to the practice of the rest of the world and made January 1 the first day of the year (Scotland having done so 150 years earlier), replacing the Julian Calendar with the Gregorian Calendar at the same time. In England the year 1751 began, as usual, on March 25, but ended on December 31, making the English year of 1751 only 282 days long.

The transition to the “New Style” calendar required that another inconsistency be resolved as well. The old Julian Calendar, which had been implemented in 46 B.C., had a built-in error, caused by miscalculating the solar year by 11 minutes. The error caused the calendar to “lose” a day every 128 years. The Gregorian Calendar had solved the problem by making the last leap year of a century a leap year only it was evenly divisible by 400. Over the passing centuries, therefore, the Gregorian calendar gradually gained days on the Julian calendar, so that by the time Great Britain got on board, the date there was 11 days earlier than the date in the rest of the West (i.e., January 1 in England was January 13 elsewhere). It was this misalignment that was solved by the elimination of the eleven days in September. The dates September 3-13, 1752 simply never occurred in Great Britain and the British colonies.

Although it has long been claimed that when the change occurred there were riots across Britain, demanding the return of the eleven “stolen” days, most historians now believe the “calendar riots” are a myth. But there was non-riotous resistance to the change. For example, many British people complained about and were suspicious of the change in dates of religious holidays, so that many continued to celebrate Christmas on the traditional day, which under the new calendar fell on January 6 rather than December 25. And some did fear that the law had shortened their lives by eleven days. There are also consequences when dating things that occurred during the period of change. When George Washington was born, for example, the date of his birth was February 11, 1731. But by sliding the calendar forward 11 days and changing New Year’s Day, his birthday under the New Style Calendar Act became February 22, 1732, the date we currently recognize. Anyone researching dates during this period will see them often referred to as “1731/32,” for example.

The image is William Hogarth’s 1755 painting “An Election Entertainment,” depicting English Whigs partying on election day, while Tories protest outside. On the floor is a stolen Tory banner which reads “Give us our Eleven Days.” This painting, intended to poke fun at election shenanigans, is believed to be one of the primary source of the “Calendar Riots” myth.

Two hundred seventy-four years ago in Great Britain and her colonies, what would normally have been September 3 was September 14 instead.

Address

Bharatpur
321204

Telephone

+917891939447

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when varun official posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to varun official:

Shortcuts

Share