09/02/2026
I hate having to make back to back controversial posts, but this one is important and I need your help to come up with a solution.
A few weeks ago I noticed something that made my stomach turn. For those who don't know, Facebook's analytics are very detailed for suggested pages like mine. I can see everything. Who's viewing what content, where they're from, other pages and things that viewers like and view, on and on. I made a post for a session I had with a young lady. It did extremely well- too well in hindsight.
I have had a pretty standard and predictable page demographic spread since I first started this page. 75-80% of my views come from women aged 25-40. Always have. Doesn't matter what kind of post I'm making. My bo***ir photos even- which you would think would have a higher rate amongst men, always women in that age range or a little older....
When I made the post I'm talking about, my demographic changed (only for this post mind you) to 92% men aged 40-65 at a MUCH larger view rate than anything else I've ever posted. My usual views are 20-25k per post. This one was 75k on the first day. (That's a lot) I deleted the post immediately because it was pretty clear why this demographic was interested in my work all of a sudden. I went through the list of names that had liked the post and banned everyone. After posting that- and deleting it, my demographic spread went back to normal and I didn't have any further issues until I saw the following news yesterday.
There was a ruling that AI generated CP, is a protected activity as long as the material doesn't leave the home (or I would also assume the home network.)
First of all WTF, Second of all and here's where the problem is- people are using photos of children they find online (as well as the company that runs the AI generator) to create disgusting photos and video.
Even more unfortunate news- they're not just going after professional photos. Some of you more than likely have people in your friends lists that have access to your personal photos and there's no way of knowing or controlling who has access to those things and what or if they're doing with them.
I'm going to take further steps to protect any photos I take, even if that means not posting them at all. Family work is a very small percentage of what I do- the majority of my work is with people over the age of 18. So it probably won't hurt my page to not post images with kids in them. Other photographers though exclusively work with families and kids and are way more vulnerable to having their work co-opted for reasons never intended.
I'm sounding the alarm early- this ruling is going to cause a lot of problems. There will be an influx of people coming to social media platforms to find photos to use now that they are protected in doing so. I don't want to be a part of that at ALL. I would assume no one does.
I know everyone looks forward to seeing their work online, the excitement and joy of the time we spend together. Having their stories told. Being seen. We're just going to have to do that differently to protect the kids.